← Back to Debrief
Paid Media

CTV Now Accounts for 51% of Magnite's Revenue. The Company Says Agentic AI Will Increase Its Volume, Not Replace It.

Every adtech company says AI is an opportunity, not a threat. Magnite is one of the few with a structural argument for why that might actually be true.

Filip Ivanković··3 min read
2 min read

Magnite reported Q1 2026 revenue of US$164.4 million, up 6% year on year. The headline number is less interesting than the mix shift underneath it: connected TV now accounts for 51% of net revenue, up from 43% a year ago. CTV has crossed the majority threshold for the first time.

The company also addressed the question that every adtech executive is being asked in 2026: what happens when agentic AI starts making media buying decisions autonomously?

Magnite's position is that agentic AI will increase transaction volume through its platform rather than bypass it. The logic: if AI agents can evaluate and execute programmatic buys faster than human traders, the number of transactions per campaign increases. More granular optimisation means more bid requests, more decisioning and more supply-side platform fees.

51%

Of Magnite's net revenue now comes from CTV, crossing the majority threshold for the first time

The CTV growth is being driven by two factors. First, the expansion of ad-supported streaming inventory globally (Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime Video all scaling their ad tiers). Second, Magnite's integration with major CTV publishers through its SpringServe ad server, which gives it a structural position in the supply chain that pure exchanges do not have.

The 6% overall revenue growth is modest by adtech standards, reflecting pressure on display and mobile programmatic where competition from Google and Amazon remains intense. But the CTV trajectory is clear, and it carries higher take rates than standard display.

Why it matters

For Australian media buyers, Magnite's CTV milestone reflects a global shift that is playing out locally. Australian BVOD inventory is increasingly transacted programmatically, and the SSPs that control CTV supply have significant pricing power.

The agentic AI argument is worth tracking. If Magnite is right that automated buying increases transaction volume, the economics of programmatic fees change. Advertisers would pay lower CPMs (more efficient buying) but higher total platform fees (more transactions). The net effect on advertiser costs is unclear and will depend on how quickly AI-driven optimisation translates to measurable performance gains.

What to do about it

If you buy CTV programmatically in Australia, understand which SSPs control the supply you are accessing. Magnite, Google Ad Manager and FreeWheel dominate different publisher relationships. Your SSP mix affects both pricing and inventory access.
Factor CTV's rising share of programmatic supply into your channel planning. The inventory is growing faster than most media plans account for.
Start evaluating agentic AI buying tools. Several DSPs are testing autonomous campaign management features. Early adopters will have a learning advantage when these become standard.
Watch CTV take rates. As CTV becomes the majority of SSP revenue, the incentive to increase fees grows. Negotiate supply path terms now while the market is still competitive.

Programmatic CTV is no longer the emerging channel. It is the dominant one. Plan accordingly.

ShareLinkedInX

Debrief

Get the next one

No spam. No fluff. Just the next article, straight to your inbox.

Filip Ivanković
Filip IvankovićFounder, New Rebellion

10+ years leading performance marketing across agencies and in-house teams in Australia. Writes about the gap between marketing activity and commercial outcomes, and what it takes to close it.

Keep reading

All articles →

If this resonated

Let's talk about your marketing

30 minutes with a senior strategist. No pitch deck, no obligation. Just an honest conversation about what you need.