← Back to Debrief
AI & Marketing

An AI Startup Stole the 'This Is Fine' Meme for an Ad. The Creator Is Not Fine About It.

These no-thought AI losers aren't untouchable and memes just don't come out of thin air.

Filip Ivanković··2 min read
2 min read

AI startup Artisan used the iconic "This is fine" comic in an advertising campaign. The problem: they did not ask the artist who created it.

KC Green, the cartoonist behind the Gunshow webcomic, created the "This is fine" panel in 2013. It became one of the most widely shared memes on the internet. Green has consistently defended his rights to the work, pushing back against NFT projects and unlicensed merchandise.

Artisan is the company behind billboards urging businesses to "stop hiring humans." Their latest ad incorporated Green's artwork without permission or payment. Green responded publicly, calling them "no-thought AI losers" and pointing out that "memes just don't come out of thin air."

When TechCrunch contacted Artisan, the company said it had "a lot of respect for KC Green and his work" and was scheduling time to speak with him directly. The standard corporate response after getting caught.

2013

The year KC Green published the 'This is fine' comic. Over a decade of cultural impact, and an AI company still thought they could use it without asking.

This is not just an IP dispute. It is a pattern. AI companies have built a culture of taking first and negotiating later. Training data scraped without consent. Creative work used in marketing without licensing. The assumption that internet culture is free to exploit.

Why it matters

For marketers, this is a practical warning about brand risk. Using unlicensed creative assets in campaigns, whether memes, illustrations or photography, creates legal exposure and reputational damage. The rules have not changed just because AI companies behave as if they do not exist.

The backlash against Artisan was immediate and widespread. In an environment where consumers and creators are increasingly hostile toward AI companies that disrespect creative work, associating your brand with that behaviour is a liability.

For Australian businesses using AI tools to generate marketing content, the IP question is not theoretical. If your AI tool produces something that closely resembles existing work, you bear the risk. Not the tool provider.

What to do about it

Audit your creative pipeline. If you are using AI-generated images or copy in campaigns, check whether the outputs resemble existing copyrighted work. Reverse image search is your friend.
Licence what you use. Memes feel free. They are not. If you want to use a recognisable piece of internet culture in marketing, contact the creator and negotiate a licence.
Review your AI tool terms. Most AI image generators disclaim liability for IP infringement in their terms of service. That means you are the one exposed if something goes wrong.
Build a creative approval process. Especially for social media teams moving fast. A five-minute check before publishing is cheaper than a cease-and-desist letter after.
ShareLinkedInX

Debrief

Get the next one

No spam. No fluff. Just the next article, straight to your inbox.

Filip Ivanković
Filip IvankovićFounder, New Rebellion

10+ years leading performance marketing across agencies and in-house teams in Australia. Writes about the gap between marketing activity and commercial outcomes, and what it takes to close it.

Keep reading

All articles →

If this resonated

Let's talk about your marketing

30 minutes with a senior strategist. No pitch deck, no obligation. Just an honest conversation about what you need.