Atlas  /  Technology

Industry profile

Cybersecurity marketing benchmarks

Strongest on Retention & Loyalty, weakest on Data & Tracking. Cybersecurity sits above the national average, and that tension shapes how the whole industry markets.

65
Marketing Score, six dimensions
61th
national percentile
Upper half
of its sector
+1
vs national average

Score signature

Digital68
Acquisition62
Conversion63
Retention70
Brand61
Data60

Bars are this industry. Ticks are the national average.

Biggest strength

Retention & Loyalty

70 out of 100. The engine carrying the whole score.

Biggest gap

Data & Tracking

60 out of 100. The dimension dragging the industry down.

Where to start

Brand & Positioning

The most upside per point of effort: 10% of the score and 3 points below the field.

The map

Where this industry sits

Every dot is an industry we measure. Choose any two dimensions for the axes. Cybersecurity is the red mark.

Retention & Loyalty
High Retention / low Acquisition
High Retention / high Acquisition
Low Retention / low Acquisition
Low Retention / high Acquisition
Cybersecurity

Acquisition Performance

DevelopingAverageAbove averageHighThis industry

Cybersecurity sits above average on Retention & Loyalty and below average on Acquisition Performance. That tension defines the industry.

The spread inside the industry

Weakest · 51Midpoint · 65Strongest · 79

Every number is a Marketing Score out of 100. It rolls six dimensions into one figure, so 51 is a business doing the basics and 79 is one that markets like a business twice its size.

Developing, under 50Average, 50 to 59Above average, 60 to 69High, 70 plus

The distance between the strongest and weakest performer here is wide. A small cluster is genuinely good. A long tail sits well behind. The bar to lead this industry is lower than the reputation suggests. So where would you land?

The breakdown

How far above or below the field

Each row plots this industry against the whole field. The dot is where Cybersecurity sits, the line is the national average and the faint marks are every other industry. Tap a row for what the dimension means.

Field lowNational avg 66Field high
40% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
57% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
46% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 62Field high
9% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 64Field high
70% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 58Field high
36% of the field scores higherTap for what it means

The read

What the numbers say about Cybersecurity

On the whole, Cybersecurity is an above-average industry. It leads on retention & loyalty and trails on data & tracking, and the fastest gains sit in brand & positioning.

What is strong

Retention & Loyalty

Sits in the leading group of every industry we measure. This is the engine carrying the score.

What holds it back

Data & Tracking

Sits in the upper half. The soft spot that drags the whole number down.

Where the upside is

Brand & Positioning

Carries the most weight in the score and sits below the field. Move this and the whole number moves with it.

A retention & loyalty-led industry with a data & tracking problem. The reputation says one thing. The pipeline says another.

70%of industries score higher on Brand & Positioning, the dimension carrying the most weight in this score. That gap is where the money is, and where most operators are not looking.

Go deeper

Selling security in a market that only buys after a breach+

The fundamental challenge of cybersecurity marketing is timing. Most businesses do not invest in security until after an incident. The Optus and Medibank breaches in 2022 drove a surge in cybersecurity spending across Australia. Before that, most SMEs treated security as an afterthought.

The composite reflects a sector that is technically competent but marketing-immature. These firms are built by engineers, not marketers. The companies that have invested in marketing capability stand out precisely because so few of their competitors have.

Retention is the anchor. Cybersecurity contracts are typically 12-36 months with high renewal rates. The firms with best retention run quarterly business reviews, proactive threat briefings and continuous security posture reporting. They make the client feel protected, which is a marketing outcome as much as a service delivery one.

Acquisition with a 25% weight is where the growth constraint sits. The firms winning here have cracked the thought leadership code. They publish research reports, contribute to industry publications, speak at events and maintain active LinkedIn presence. In B2B security, the firm that educates the market gets the call when the budget is approved.

Digital maturity is reasonable but should be higher for a tech category. Many cybersecurity firms have websites that feel like they were built in 2018. The irony of a security company with outdated web infrastructure is not lost on prospects. The firms investing in modern, fast, well-structured websites with clear service descriptions and trust signals convert better.

Retention-led growth in a fear-driven category+

Retention carries 25% and scores 69.7, the highest dimension. Once a business entrusts its security to a provider, switching costs are high. The data, the integrations, the institutional knowledge. This makes retention both natural and valuable.

Acquisition and conversion each carry 25% and 20% respectively. Cybersecurity is a considered purchase with long sales cycles. The buyer is typically a CTO, IT manager or risk committee. They do not respond to impulse marketing. They respond to proof: case studies, certifications and demonstrated expertise.

Data and tracking at 5% weight is ironic for an industry built on monitoring. The score of 60.4 suggests many cybersecurity firms are better at tracking their clients's systems than their own marketing performance.

Where cybersecurity firms should invest+

Acquisition is the bottleneck. The highest-performing firms run thought leadership programs: published research, vulnerability disclosures, industry conference presence and content that demonstrates expertise without giving away the playbook. This is not content marketing as most industries know it. It is credibility marketing.

Conversion efficiency can improve through the sales process itself. Cybersecurity purchases involve multiple stakeholders. The firms that provide ROI calculators, risk assessment tools and compliance checklists reduce friction in the buying committee.

Brand needs attention despite the low weight. In security, brand is trust. Certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2), government clearances and published case studies with named clients carry more brand weight than any advertising campaign.

Highlighted terms link through to the marketing dictionary.

Frequently asked

Common questions about Cybersecurity

How do Australian cybersecurity companies perform on marketing?+
The industry composite is 65. Retention leads, reflecting long contract cycles and high switching costs. Acquisition is the primary growth constraint, with most firms underinvesting in thought leadership and content marketing.
What marketing works for cybersecurity firms?+
Thought leadership is the primary acquisition channel: published research, conference presentations, vulnerability disclosures and LinkedIn content. The industry scores 62 on acquisition, with top performers using educational content to build credibility before the sales conversation begins.
How important is brand for cybersecurity companies?+
Critically important despite the 10% weight (scoring 61). In security, brand equals trust. Certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2), named client case studies and government clearances carry more brand weight than advertising. Prospects evaluate security vendors on credibility before they evaluate on capability.
What is the typical sales cycle for cybersecurity services?+
Typically 3-12 months depending on deal size and buyer type. SME engagements can close in 4-8 weeks. Enterprise and government contracts take 6-12 months with multiple stakeholder approvals. The conversion efficiency score of 63 reflects this complexity.

Keep exploring

Where to go from here

Pull any thread.

Same sector

B2B SaaS & Software

High overall. Strongest on Digital.

Open the profile

Same sector

Crypto & Web3

Above average overall. Strongest on Digital.

Open the profile

The sector

Technology

Every industry in this sector, ranked.

Open the sector

The full Atlas

Explore every industry

The marketing map of corporate Australia.

Open the Atlas
See how the scoring worksExplore the full Atlas