← Back to Debrief
AnalyticsIndustry Trends

You Can't See the Return Until You've Invested. That's the Point.

Data and Tracking is the lowest-scoring dimension across every industry we've assessed. Not conversion. Not acquisition. Not brand. Tracking. The thing that tells you whether everything else is working.

Filip Ivanković··5 min read
5 min read

More money is flowing into Australian marketing than ever before. Budgets keep growing. Channels keep multiplying. And most of the businesses spending it have no reliable way of knowing what that money actually did.

That's the finding that keeps showing up in our work. We've scored more than 700 Australian businesses across 70 industries on six marketing dimensions. Digital Maturity. Acquisition Performance. Conversion Efficiency. Retention and Loyalty. Brand and Positioning. Data and Tracking. The last one finishes dead last. Every time.

57.20

Average Data and Tracking score across 70 Australian industries. The lowest of all six dimensions, 8 points below the highest.

The average Data and Tracking score across all industries sits at 57.20 out of 100. Digital Maturity, the highest-scoring dimension, averages 65.61. That is an 8.41 point gap between the thing businesses are most comfortable with (having a website, running social, showing up online) and the thing that tells them whether any of it is working.

Beauty salons score 39.30. Immigration services, 45.22. Trades businesses, 45.75. Even the top performers, EdTech at 69.40 and automotive servicing at 69.10, barely cross into what we'd consider average territory.

The question is why. The tools are largely free. GA4 costs nothing. Google Search Console costs nothing. Google Tag Manager costs nothing. The tutorials are everywhere. Professional setup runs $850 to $5,600 depending on complexity. This is not an infrastructure problem that requires six figures and a data team. So what is going on?

The catch-22

Here's the pattern we see. A business owner looks at tracking and measurement and thinks: prove to me this will be worth it before I spend money on it. Show me the return. And that's the trap. Because the entire point of tracking is to make the return visible. You cannot see the return until you've invested in the infrastructure that measures it. But you won't invest because you can't see the return.

That catch-22 is why Data and Tracking sits at the bottom. It's the one dimension where the value is invisible until after you've committed. Acquisition Performance has obvious outputs. You run ads, you get leads. Brand and Positioning has visible signals. People recognise you, they talk about you. But tracking? Tracking is the thing that tells you whether those leads are profitable and whether that recognition converts into revenue. Without it, you are making capital allocation decisions in the dark.

If you're waiting for the results that kiss you on the lips, it's not gonna happen. Not without the infrastructure to measure them.

I worked with a lead generation business that had more than 150 products. We didn't know what products were working, what products weren't working. We didn't understand the profitability of each product. And that made it really hard to make capital allocation decisions to understand where the value goes and what our cost tolerance is for each particular subset. The business wasn't failing. Revenue was coming in. But nobody could tell you which products were earning their keep and which ones were subsidising waste. That is what happens when tracking is an afterthought. The maths doesn't work without the data.

150+

Products in a single client's portfolio. Nobody could tell you which ones were profitable. That is what zero tracking infrastructure looks like at scale.

It is not a tech problem

A lot of the time, the marketing team sits in a silo and nobody asks the question. A lot of marketers aren't very good with numbers, and I think that's pretty well documented. And I think that causes a lot of anxiety. So then they don't necessarily reach out to the data teams. They are anxious, and they are scared to ask for help, and they don't know if they are allowed.

That's the part nobody talks about. The reason tracking doesn't get built isn't that the technology is hard. It's that the responsibility falls between two teams and neither one picks it up. Marketing thinks it's a tech job. IT thinks it's a marketing job. The business owner doesn't know it exists until something goes wrong. And a lot of data projects aren't super proactive. They're reactive. Oh shit, something's gone wrong. Let's look at the numbers. But by then the damage is already done.

Deloitte surveyed more than 1,000 Australian SMBs and found that while two-thirds are using AI in some form, just 5% are fully enabled to realise its potential. The bottleneck isn't the software. It's the data infrastructure underneath it. You can't run proper attribution or anything remotely clever with your campaigns if you haven't built the plumbing first.

Most people don't have that. Most people don't measure that, and most people don't seek it out.

The circle work

Without data, you get circle work. Effort that goes around and around without compounding into anything. The same meeting every month. The same report with the same vanity metrics. The same "let's try something different" that isn't informed by anything except a feeling. The same pattern shows up in how businesses choose channels. Without data to tell you what's actually driving value, every decision is a guess. And guesses repeated monthly become a budget.

The measurement problem is an open secret. Every marketing conference in Australia puts it on the agenda. Every platform promises better attribution. The conversation keeps happening because nobody has fixed it at the business level. Individual companies have not built the infrastructure to know whether their spend is earning its keep.

Breaking the cycle

The fix isn't complicated. It's just unsexy. Nobody gets promoted for setting up conversion tracking. But everybody notices when nobody can explain where the budget went.

Start with what you have. GA4 is free and it's already installed on most Australian business websites. The problem is nobody has configured it properly. Conversions aren't set up. Events aren't tracking. Cross-domain is broken. That's not a budget problem. That's an afternoon's work with someone who knows what they're looking at.

Then connect the spend to the outcome. If you're spending money on Google Ads, your conversion tracking should tell you exactly what each lead costs and what it's worth downstream. If you're investing in SEO, your Search Console data should show you which queries are driving commercial intent, not just impressions. The data exists. The pipeline to collect it, store it and read it is what's missing.

The catch-22 breaks when you stop waiting for proof and start building the infrastructure that creates it. You don't need a data team. You don't need a six-figure analytics platform. You need someone to own it. One person who says: this is mine, and I'm going to make sure we know what our marketing is actually doing.

That's the investment. And it's a fraction of what most businesses are already spending on the ads they can't measure.

Warning: If your tracking is broken, every other marketing metric you're looking at is a fiction. Fix the plumbing before you optimise the taps.

Want to see where your business sits? Check your industry's benchmark scores or run your own scorecard.

ShareLinkedInX

Debrief

Get the next one

No spam. No fluff. Just the next article, straight to your inbox.

Filip Ivanković
Filip IvankovićFounder, New Rebellion

10+ years leading performance marketing across agencies and in-house teams in Australia. Writes about the gap between marketing activity and commercial outcomes, and what it takes to close it.

Keep reading

All articles →

If this resonated

Let's talk about your marketing

30 minutes with a senior strategist. No pitch deck, no obligation. Just an honest conversation about what you need.