Atlas  /  Primary & Industrial

Industry profile

Transport & Logistics marketing benchmarks

Strongest on Brand & Positioning, weakest on Conversion Efficiency. Transport & Logistics sits below the national average, and that tension shapes how the whole industry markets.

63
Marketing Score, six dimensions
43th
national percentile
Upper half
of its sector
-1
vs national average

Score signature

Digital66
Acquisition61
Conversion61
Retention63
Brand68
Data61

Bars are this industry. Ticks are the national average.

Biggest strength

Brand & Positioning

68 out of 100. The engine carrying the whole score.

Biggest gap

Conversion Efficiency

61 out of 100. The dimension dragging the industry down.

Where to start

Conversion Efficiency

The most upside per point of effort: 20% of the score and 2 points below the field.

The map

Where this industry sits

Every dot is an industry we measure. Choose any two dimensions for the axes. Transport & Logistics is the red mark.

Retention & Loyalty
High Retention / low Acquisition
High Retention / high Acquisition
Low Retention / low Acquisition
Low Retention / high Acquisition
Transport & Logistics

Acquisition Performance

DevelopingAverageAbove averageHighThis industry

Transport & Logistics sits above average on Retention & Loyalty and below average on Acquisition Performance. That tension defines the industry.

The spread inside the industry

Weakest · 46Midpoint · 63Strongest · 82

Every number is a Marketing Score out of 100. It rolls six dimensions into one figure, so 46 is a business doing the basics and 82 is one that markets like a business twice its size.

Developing, under 50Average, 50 to 59Above average, 60 to 69High, 70 plus

The distance between the strongest and weakest performer here is wide. A small cluster is genuinely good. A long tail sits well behind. The bar to lead this industry is lower than the reputation suggests. So where would you land?

The breakdown

How far above or below the field

Each row plots this industry against the whole field. The dot is where Transport & Logistics sits, the line is the national average and the faint marks are every other industry. Tap a row for what the dimension means.

Field lowNational avg 66Field high
56% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
70% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
63% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 62Field high
49% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 64Field high
29% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 58Field high
30% of the field scores higherTap for what it means

The read

What the numbers say about Transport & Logistics

On the whole, Transport & Logistics is a middle-of-the-pack industry. It leads on brand & positioning and trails on conversion efficiency, and the fastest gains sit in conversion efficiency.

What is strong

Brand & Positioning

Sits in the upper half of every industry we measure. This is the engine carrying the score.

What holds it back

Conversion Efficiency

Sits in the lower half. The soft spot that drags the whole number down.

Where the upside is

Conversion Efficiency

Carries the most weight in the score and sits below the field. Move this and the whole number moves with it.

A brand & positioning-led industry with a conversion efficiency problem. The reputation says one thing. The pipeline says another.

63%of industries score higher on Conversion Efficiency, the dimension carrying the most weight in this score. That gap is where the money is, and where most operators are not looking.

Go deeper

The Qantas distortion and what transport marketing really looks like+

Transport and Logistics scores 63.1 composite, ranking 40th of 70 industries. But this number comes with an asterisk. Qantas at 82 composite is one of the strongest single-company scores in any industry. It pulls the average up meaningfully. The typical logistics or freight company in this vertical scores closer to 55.

The Qantas outlier illustrates a broader pattern: consumer-facing transport companies (airlines, ride-share, passenger rail) invest heavily in marketing because they're competing for individual purchase decisions. B2B logistics companies (freight, warehousing, last-mile delivery) treat marketing as a support function at best.

Brand and Positioning is the strongest dimension, driven partly by Qantas but also by the inherent importance of reliability and trust in transport. When you're responsible for moving goods or people, your brand is your promise to deliver. The companies that communicate that promise consistently score higher.

Data and Tracking is weak but not surprising. Most logistics companies have exceptional operational data (route optimisation, delivery times, fleet management) but don't apply the same rigour to marketing measurement. The freight company that knows its average delivery time to the minute but can't tell you which marketing channel generates the best contract leads is the norm, not the exception.

The comparison to Commercial Real Estate is useful. Both are B2B industries with long sales cycles and relationship-driven acquisition. Commercial real estate outperforms transport by 5 points despite similar structural challenges. The difference is that CRE firms have invested in brand and digital presence over the past decade. Most logistics companies haven't.

Why retention carries 25% in transport+

Retention and Loyalty gets 25% because transport and logistics businesses depend on repeat contracts. A freight company that loses a major client loses revenue that takes months to replace. Acquisition (20%) and Conversion (20%) share equal weight because winning new business is a slow process involving tenders, trials and relationship building.

Brand and Positioning at 15% reflects the importance of trust in an industry where you're moving people's goods or moving people themselves. Digital Maturity (15%) and Data (5%) round out the score. Most logistics companies don't need cutting-edge websites. They need reliable service and clear communication.

Where transport companies can close the gap+

Retention sits below the national average and well below what the category leaders achieve through loyalty ecosystems. You don't need a loyalty program on that scale, but you do need a systematic approach to keeping existing clients engaged. Quarterly business reviews, proactive communication during disruptions and service level reporting go further than most logistics companies realise.

Acquisition is soft. Most transport companies rely on tenders and referrals. Building a content presence around industry expertise, supply chain insights and route-specific data creates inbound interest that reduces dependency on tender cycles.

Brand and Positioning is actually the strongest dimension. That's the platform to build from. If your reputation is already solid, invest in making that reputation visible to the prospects who don't already know you.

Highlighted terms link through to the marketing dictionary.

Frequently asked

Common questions about Transport & Logistics

How does Australian transport and logistics marketing compare to other industries?+
Transport and Logistics scores 63 composite, ranking 40th of 70 industries. This is 1 points below the national average of 64. The score is elevated by Qantas (82). Most logistics companies score significantly lower.
How do the top transport and logistics brands compare to the industry average?+
Qantas Airways leads the vertical composite, well above the transport and logistics industry average of 63. Large consumer-facing operators with loyalty programs and decades of brand investment sit well ahead of the freight and logistics businesses that anchor this vertical.
What is the biggest marketing gap in transport and logistics?+
Retention and Loyalty is the key gap. Most logistics companies don't systematically manage client relationships beyond the contract cycle. Proactive communication, quarterly reviews and service reporting are underused retention tools.
Should logistics companies invest more in digital marketing?+
Yes. Digital Maturity and Acquisition both suggest underinvestment. Building content presence around supply chain expertise and route-specific data creates inbound interest that reduces dependency on tender cycles and referrals.

Keep exploring

Where to go from here

Pull any thread.

Same sector

Agriculture & Agribusiness

Above average overall. Strongest on Brand.

Open the profile

Same sector

Manufacturing & Industrial

Above average overall. Strongest on Brand.

Open the profile

The sector

Primary & Industrial

Every industry in this sector, ranked.

Open the sector

The full Atlas

Explore every industry

The marketing map of corporate Australia.

Open the Atlas
See how the scoring worksExplore the full Atlas