Atlas  /  Technology

Industry profile

IT Services & Managed Services (MSP) marketing benchmarks

Strongest on Retention & Loyalty, weakest on Data & Tracking. IT Services & Managed Services (MSP) sits below the national average, and that tension shapes how the whole industry markets.

63
Marketing Score, six dimensions
37th
national percentile
Lower half
of its sector
-1
vs national average

Score signature

Digital64
Acquisition57
Conversion59
Retention72
Brand54
Data52

Bars are this industry. Ticks are the national average.

Biggest strength

Retention & Loyalty

72 out of 100. The engine carrying the whole score.

Biggest gap

Data & Tracking

52 out of 100. The dimension dragging the industry down.

Where to start

Acquisition Performance

The most upside per point of effort: 20% of the score and 6 points below the field.

The map

Where this industry sits

Every dot is an industry we measure. Choose any two dimensions for the axes. IT Services & Managed Services (MSP) is the red mark.

Retention & Loyalty
High Retention / low Acquisition
High Retention / high Acquisition
Low Retention / low Acquisition
Low Retention / high Acquisition
IT Services & Managed Services (MSP)

Acquisition Performance

DevelopingAverageAbove averageHighThis industry

IT Services & Managed Services (MSP) sits above average on Retention & Loyalty and below average on Acquisition Performance. That tension defines the industry.

The spread inside the industry

Weakest · 51Midpoint · 63Strongest · 72

Every number is a Marketing Score out of 100. It rolls six dimensions into one figure, so 51 is a business doing the basics and 72 is one that markets like a business twice its size.

Developing, under 50Average, 50 to 59Above average, 60 to 69High, 70 plus

The distance between the strongest and weakest performer here is wide. A small cluster is genuinely good. A long tail sits well behind. The bar to lead this industry is lower than the reputation suggests. So where would you land?

The breakdown

How far above or below the field

Each row plots this industry against the whole field. The dot is where IT Services & Managed Services (MSP) sits, the line is the national average and the faint marks are every other industry. Tap a row for what the dimension means.

Field lowNational avg 66Field high
64% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
86% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
79% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 62Field high
6% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 64Field high
94% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 58Field high
81% of the field scores higherTap for what it means

The read

What the numbers say about IT Services & Managed Services (MSP)

On the whole, IT Services & Managed Services (MSP) is a below-average industry. It leads on retention & loyalty and trails on data & tracking, and the fastest gains sit in acquisition performance.

What is strong

Retention & Loyalty

Sits right at the top of every industry we measure. This is the engine carrying the score.

What holds it back

Data & Tracking

Sits near the back of the field. The soft spot that drags the whole number down.

Where the upside is

Acquisition Performance

Carries the most weight in the score and sits below the field. Move this and the whole number moves with it.

A retention & loyalty-led industry with a data & tracking problem. The reputation says one thing. The pipeline says another.

86%of industries score higher on Acquisition Performance, the dimension carrying the most weight in this score. That gap is where the money is, and where most operators are not looking.

Go deeper

The managed services paradox: brilliant at IT, mediocre at marketing+

MSPs are technology companies that typically do not apply their own expertise to their marketing. The composite reflects this paradox. These are organisations that manage sophisticated IT infrastructure for their clients but run their own marketing on basic websites, sporadic LinkedIn posts and networking events.

Retention with 35% weight is the defining characteristic. MSP contracts are sticky. The switching costs are real: migration risk, relationship rebuilding, institutional knowledge loss. The top-performing MSPs make retention deliberate rather than relying on inertia. Quarterly business reviews, proactive technology roadmapping and strategic advisory beyond break-fix support all strengthen the relationship.

The acquisition challenge is structural. MSP sales cycles are 3-6 months. The buyer is usually a business owner, financial controller or IT manager who has been unhappy with their current provider for months before actively searching. The MSPs that create content addressing pain points ("why does our IT keep breaking?", "are we paying too much for IT support?") capture these prospects during the consideration phase.

Brand is the strategic weakness. Walk through a list of 20 MSP websites in any Australian city and you will struggle to tell them apart. Same service descriptions, same Microsoft and Dell logos, same "partner" language. The MSPs that break out of this homogeneity, through vertical specialisation, through distinctive positioning, through content that demonstrates genuine expertise, win disproportionate market share.

Data and tracking confirms the marketing measurement gap. Most MSPs track tickets and SLA compliance religiously but have no idea which marketing activities generate their best leads. The ones that implement pipeline tracking from marketing source through to contract value make dramatically better investment decisions.

Retention is everything in managed services+

Retention carries 35% of the composite, the highest retention weight of any industry. For MSPs, a client on a managed services contract represents $50,000-$500,000 in annual recurring revenue. Losing a client is catastrophic. Keeping one is transformative.

Acquisition and conversion carry 20% each. MSP sales cycles are long (3-6 months) and relationship-driven. The business model does not require high volume acquisition. It requires quality leads that convert into long-term contracts.

Brand and positioning at 10% and 54.3, the weakest dimension, exposes the sector's biggest strategic gap. Most MSPs look identical: same service lists, same technology logos on the website, same "your IT partner" messaging. The ones that differentiate, by industry vertical, by company size, by outcome, win more deals.

Where MSPs should focus marketing effort+

Brand is the most actionable gap. MSPs that specialise, by vertical (legal, healthcare, manufacturing) or by client profile (SME vs mid-market), differentiate in a sea of generalists. Specialisation enables higher prices, better retention and more effective content marketing.

Acquisition with 20% weight can improve through content marketing and referral systems. SEO content targeting IT pain points ("slow network", "data backup solutions", "cyber insurance requirements") captures high-intent traffic. Client referral incentives tap the most trusted acquisition channel.

Digital maturity with 10% weight is adequate but the sector should lead here. MSPs sell technology services. Their own digital presence should be best in class. Many MSP websites are dated, slow and fail to demonstrate the technical capability they sell to clients.

Highlighted terms link through to the marketing dictionary.

Frequently asked

Common questions about IT Services & Managed Services (MSP)

How do Australian MSPs compare on marketing?+
The sector averages a composite. Retention dominates (35% weight), the highest retention score and weight combination in any industry. Brand is the weakest dimension, reflecting widespread lack of differentiation among MSPs.
What is the biggest marketing mistake MSPs make?+
Lack of differentiation. Brand scores just 54. Most MSP websites look identical: same services, same partner logos, same messaging. Specialisation by industry vertical or client profile is the single most effective brand strategy for MSPs.
How should MSPs generate leads?+
Content marketing targeting IT pain points drives the strongest results at the 57 acquisition score. SEO content addressing specific problems, client referral programs and strategic partnerships with complementary vendors outperform generic advertising. MSP sales cycles are 3-6 months, so nurture strategies matter more than direct response.
How important is client retention for MSPs?+
The most important metric. Retention carries 35% weight, the highest of any industry. A single client represents $50K-$500K in annual recurring revenue. Quarterly business reviews, proactive technology roadmapping and strategic advisory beyond break-fix support are the highest-ROI retention activities.

Keep exploring

Where to go from here

Pull any thread.

Same sector

B2B SaaS & Software

High overall. Strongest on Digital.

Open the profile

Same sector

Crypto & Web3

Above average overall. Strongest on Digital.

Open the profile

The sector

Technology

Every industry in this sector, ranked.

Open the sector

From the Debrief

Netflix Makes $1.47 Billion in Australia and Sends $1.35 Billion of It Overseas. The Local Content Argument Gets Harder to Ignore.

Netflix generated $1.47 billion in Australian revenue in 2025 and transferred 92 percent of it offshore as distribution fees to parent entities. The model is legal. It is also fuelling a sharper political and industry debate about streaming services and Australian content obligations — and what that means for local production and advertising.

Read it
See how the scoring worksExplore the full Atlas