Atlas / Food & Hospitality

Hotels & Resorts

25.9 points separate the best and worst in Hotels & Resorts.
Marriott AU leads at 78.9. The bottom of this vertical sits 25.9 points lower. The industry composite masks a gap that tells you more about execution quality than market conditions.
64.8
Marketing Score
#30
of 70 industries
#3
of 7 in Food & Hospitality
25.9
pts spread (top to bottom)
9 scored businesses
3 Dominant
Best dimension: Brand & Positioning
255075100DIG68ACQ64.2CON65RET62.1BRA68.6DAT59.8
This industry
Food & Hospitality avg
All-industry avg

The shape tilts toward Brand & Positioning (68.6) and away from Data & Tracking (59.8). That tilt tells you where the industry's marketing dollars have gone and where they haven't. The businesses that correct the tilt first will see outsized returns because they're fixing the constraint that's holding everything else back.

Dimension Breakdown

Digital Maturity20% weight
28th of 70. Mid-pack. Not broken, not competitive.
68
#28+2 vs avg
avg 66
Show insightMedium band
Acquisition Performance25% weight
25th of 70. Weight: 25%. Middle of the pack.
64.2
#25+1.3 vs avg
avg 62.9
Show insightMedium band
Conversion Efficiency20% weight
27th of 70. Weight: 20%. Median territory.
65
#27+1.8 vs avg
avg 63.2
Show insightMedium band
Retention & Loyalty25% weight
38th of 70. Weight: 25%.
62.1
#38-0.3 vs avg
avg 62.4
Show insightMedium band
Brand & Positioning7% weight
17th of 70. Weight: 7%.
68.6
#17+4.4 vs avg
avg 64.2
Show insightMedium band
Data & Tracking3% weight
29th of 70. Weight: 3%.
59.8
#29+2.2 vs avg
avg 57.6
Show insightMedium band
#30
of 70 industries

Mid-table. Not broken, not exceptional. The businesses that invest in their marketing here will see disproportionate returns because their competitors aren't.

25.9
point spread

Marriott AU at 78.9 vs Saffire Freycinet at 53. That gap is wider than the difference between some entire industries. The leaders in this vertical are playing a different game.

68.6
Brand & Positioning

+4.4 versus the national average of 64.2. This is where the industry has invested. The question is whether it's investing enough everywhere else to capitalise on that strength.

Dimension Weights
Dig 20%
Acq 25%
Con 20%
Ret 25%

The OTA squeeze and the fight for direct bookings

The central tension of Australian hotel marketing is the relationship with online travel agencies. Booking.com and Expedia deliver guests, but at commission rates of 15-25% that erode margin. The composite of 64.8 reflects a sector that is competent at marketing but financially pressured by distribution costs.

Brand and positioning at 68.6 is the strongest dimension. Hotels are inherently brand businesses. The property, the location, the experience, the visual identity: these are the marketing. The hotels with strong brand scores have invested in professional photography, curated social content and a website experience that matches the on-property experience.

The OTA dependency shows up in the acquisition score of 64.2. Hotels that rely primarily on OTAs for bookings have outsourced their acquisition to platforms that prioritise their own revenue over the hotel's margin. The properties winning on acquisition have invested in direct booking strategies: best-rate guarantees on their own website, email marketing to past guests, Google Hotel Ads and metasearch.

Retention at 62.1 with 25% weight separates the best from the rest. Loyalty programs (Accor ALL, Marriott Bonvoy, IHG Rewards) drive repeat bookings for chain hotels. Independent properties that build guest databases, send personalised offers and remember guest preferences achieve similar retention without the brand investment.

Digital maturity at 68.0 is driven by operational tech: property management systems, channel managers, revenue management and booking engines. This operational technology also feeds marketing capability. The hotels connecting their PMS data to their marketing platforms can send the right offer to the right guest at the right time.

A 25.9-point spread between Marriott AU and Saffire Freycinet. That's not one industry. That's two separate leagues operating under the same name. The leaders are playing chess. The challengers are still learning the rules.

Where you sit in Food & Hospitality

#3
Hotels & Resorts
64.8

Explore deeper in Hub

Cross-cut Hotels & Resorts data by taxonomy, compare dimensions across sectors and see where this industry sits nationally.

Create your Hub

Frequently Asked

Keep Exploring

Related industries, patterns and businesses in the Atlas.

Same sector — Food & Hospitality
Same pattern — Wide Spread
Head to head

Closest composite scores to Hotels & Resorts (65).

Top businesses in this industry

Where does your business sit in this picture?

Hotels & Resorts scores 64.8 on average. That's one number across 6 dimensions. Your number will be different, and the breakdown will tell you exactly where to invest and where to stop wasting money.

Get your Marketing Score

Keep Exploring

Related industries, patterns and businesses in the Atlas.

Same sector — Food & Hospitality
Same pattern — Wide Spread
Head to head

Closest composite scores to Hotels & Resorts (65).

Top businesses in this industry