Atlas  /  Financial Services

Industry profile

Health Insurance marketing benchmarks

Strongest on Retention & Loyalty, weakest on Data & Tracking. Health Insurance sits above the national average, and that tension shapes how the whole industry markets.

66
Marketing Score, six dimensions
66th
national percentile
Lower half
of its sector
+2
vs national average

Score signature

Digital67
Acquisition64
Conversion65
Retention70
Brand62
Data54

Bars are this industry. Ticks are the national average.

Biggest strength

Retention & Loyalty

70 out of 100. The engine carrying the whole score.

Biggest gap

Data & Tracking

54 out of 100. The dimension dragging the industry down.

Where to start

Data & Tracking

The most upside per point of effort: 5% of the score and 3 points below the field.

The map

Where this industry sits

Every dot is an industry we measure. Choose any two dimensions for the axes. Health Insurance is the red mark.

Retention & Loyalty
High Retention / low Acquisition
High Retention / high Acquisition
Low Retention / low Acquisition
Low Retention / high Acquisition
Health Insurance

Acquisition Performance

DevelopingAverageAbove averageHighThis industry

Health Insurance sits above average on Retention & Loyalty and above average on Acquisition Performance. That tension defines the industry.

The spread inside the industry

Weakest · 53Midpoint · 66Strongest · 74

Every number is a Marketing Score out of 100. It rolls six dimensions into one figure, so 53 is a business doing the basics and 74 is one that markets like a business twice its size.

Developing, under 50Average, 50 to 59Above average, 60 to 69High, 70 plus

The distance between the strongest and weakest performer here is wide. A small cluster is genuinely good. A long tail sits well behind. The bar to lead this industry is lower than the reputation suggests. So where would you land?

The breakdown

How far above or below the field

Each row plots this industry against the whole field. The dot is where Health Insurance sits, the line is the national average and the faint marks are every other industry. Tap a row for what the dimension means.

Field lowNational avg 66Field high
51% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
39% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
36% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 62Field high
10% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 64Field high
66% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 58Field high
69% of the field scores higherTap for what it means

The read

What the numbers say about Health Insurance

On the whole, Health Insurance is an above-average industry. It leads on retention & loyalty and trails on data & tracking, and the fastest gains sit in data & tracking.

What is strong

Retention & Loyalty

Sits in the leading group of every industry we measure. This is the engine carrying the score.

What holds it back

Data & Tracking

Sits in the lower half. The soft spot that drags the whole number down.

Where the upside is

Data & Tracking

Carries the most weight in the score and sits below the field. Move this and the whole number moves with it.

A retention & loyalty-led industry with a data & tracking problem. The reputation says one thing. The pipeline says another.

69%of industries score higher on Data & Tracking, the dimension carrying the most weight in this score. That gap is where the money is, and where most operators are not looking.

Go deeper

Marketing a product Australians love to hate+

Health insurance is one of the most disliked product categories in Australia. Annual premium increases, complex policies, exclusion periods and claims disputes generate consistent negative sentiment. Yet 44% of Australians hold private health cover. The composite reflects an industry that markets effectively despite this headwind.

Retention is the anchor, and for good reason. Losing a member after five years of premium payments means losing the return on a $300-$800 acquisition cost plus the margin that was just beginning to compound. The top-performing funds (Medibank, HCF, HBF) invest heavily in member experience: digital claims, optical and dental networks, wellness programs and proactive communication.

Acquisition with 25% weight is dominated by three channels: comparison sites (iSelect, Compare the Market, Canstar), direct digital campaigns targeting the under-30 LHC cohort and corporate group schemes. The funds that win on acquisition have streamlined the comparison and sign-up process to reduce the friction of switching.

The brand challenge is structural. Health insurance is a grudge purchase. Nobody is excited to pay their premium. The brands that have shifted the narrative from "insurance you have to have" to "a health partner that helps you live better" score above the mean. HCF's "uncommon care" positioning and Medibank's wellness focus are examples of this reframing.

Digital maturity reflects significant investment in online self-service. Digital claims, policy management, provider search and hospital gap estimators have become table stakes. The funds still relying on phone-based service for routine transactions are losing younger members to digitally-native competitors like those offering fully app-based health cover.

Retention-anchored in a grudge purchase category+

Retention carries 25% and scores 69.6. Health insurance is the definition of a retention business. Acquiring a member costs $300-$800. The margin on that member builds over years. Every year of retention compounds value.

Acquisition at 25% reflects the constant need to grow membership, driven by competitive pressure, the PHI rebate and the lifetime health cover loading that incentivises under-30s to join.

Brand at 5% is the lowest weight, which seems wrong for a category where brand trust matters enormously. The low weight reflects that brand impact is mediated through retention (trusted brands retain) and acquisition (trusted brands attract). The direct brand measure captures positioning clarity.

Where health insurers should focus+

Retention is strong but the cost of failure is high. A 1% improvement in retention for a major health fund translates to millions in lifetime value retained. Claims experience, digital self-service, communication clarity and extras utilisation all drive retention.

Brand is the weakest dimension and the trust challenge. Australian consumers distrust health insurers. Premium increases, exclusions and claims knockbacks drive negative sentiment. The brands investing in transparency, claims simplification and proactive communication are rebuilding trust.

Conversion with 20% weight can improve in the comparison and switching process. The funds that make it easy to compare, easy to understand what is covered and easy to switch capture more of the switching pool.

Highlighted terms link through to the marketing dictionary.

Frequently asked

Common questions about Health Insurance

How do Australian health insurers compare on marketing?+
The sector scores a composite. Retention leads (25% weight), reflecting the membership-based business model. Brand is the weakest dimension, driven by structural consumer distrust of health insurance.
What drives health insurance customer retention?+
Claims experience, digital self-service, communication transparency and extras utilisation. The retention score of 70 is highest among funds that invest in seamless digital claims, proactive member communication and wellness programs that give members a reason to engage beyond just holding a policy.
How do health insurers acquire new members?+
Comparison sites (iSelect, Compare the Market, Canstar) are the primary acquisition channel. Direct digital campaigns targeting the under-30 LHC loading cohort and corporate group schemes supplement. The acquisition score of 64 rewards funds with streamlined comparison and frictionless switching.
Why is brand trust low for health insurers?+
Brand scores 62, the weakest dimension. Annual premium increases (typically 3-6%), complex exclusion periods, claims disputes and perceived lack of value drive negative sentiment. Funds that invest in transparency, proactive communication and repositioning as health partners rather than insurers score above the average.

Keep exploring

Where to go from here

Pull any thread.

Same sector

Retail Banking & Neobanks

High overall. Strongest on Digital.

Open the profile

Same sector

Superannuation & Wealth Management

Above average overall. Strongest on Digital.

Open the profile

The sector

Financial Services

Every industry in this sector, ranked.

Open the sector

The full Atlas

Explore every industry

The marketing map of corporate Australia.

Open the Atlas
See how the scoring worksExplore the full Atlas