Atlas  /  Health & Wellbeing

Industry profile

Dental & Orthodontics marketing benchmarks

Strongest on Retention & Loyalty, weakest on Data & Tracking. Dental & Orthodontics sits below the national average, and that tension shapes how the whole industry markets.

58
Marketing Score, six dimensions
4th
national percentile
Lower half
of its sector
-6
vs national average

Score signature

Digital59
Acquisition56
Conversion58
Retention60
Brand57
Data50

Bars are this industry. Ticks are the national average.

Biggest strength

Retention & Loyalty

60 out of 100. The engine carrying the whole score.

Biggest gap

Data & Tracking

50 out of 100. The dimension dragging the industry down.

Where to start

Acquisition Performance

The most upside per point of effort: 25% of the score and 7 points below the field.

The map

Where this industry sits

Every dot is an industry we measure. Choose any two dimensions for the axes. Dental & Orthodontics is the red mark.

Retention & Loyalty
High Retention / low Acquisition
High Retention / high Acquisition
Low Retention / low Acquisition
Low Retention / high Acquisition
Dental & Orthodontics

Acquisition Performance

DevelopingAverageAbove averageHighThis industry

Dental & Orthodontics sits below average on Retention & Loyalty and below average on Acquisition Performance. That tension defines the industry.

The spread inside the industry

Weakest · 48Midpoint · 58Strongest · 72

Every number is a Marketing Score out of 100. It rolls six dimensions into one figure, so 48 is a business doing the basics and 72 is one that markets like a business twice its size.

Developing, under 50Average, 50 to 59Above average, 60 to 69High, 70 plus

The distance between the strongest and weakest performer here is wide. A small cluster is genuinely good. A long tail sits well behind. The bar to lead this industry is lower than the reputation suggests. So where would you land?

The breakdown

How far above or below the field

Each row plots this industry against the whole field. The dot is where Dental & Orthodontics sits, the line is the national average and the faint marks are every other industry. Tap a row for what the dimension means.

Field lowNational avg 66Field high
96% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
93% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
86% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 62Field high
73% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 64Field high
87% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 58Field high
93% of the field scores higherTap for what it means

The read

What the numbers say about Dental & Orthodontics

On the whole, Dental & Orthodontics is one of the weaker industries we measure. It leads on retention & loyalty and trails on data & tracking, and the fastest gains sit in acquisition performance.

What is strong

Retention & Loyalty

Sits in the lower half of every industry we measure. This is the engine carrying the score.

What holds it back

Data & Tracking

Sits near the back of the field. The soft spot that drags the whole number down.

Where the upside is

Acquisition Performance

Carries the most weight in the score and sits below the field. Move this and the whole number moves with it.

A retention & loyalty-led industry with a data & tracking problem. The reputation says one thing. The pipeline says another.

93%of industries score higher on Acquisition Performance, the dimension carrying the most weight in this score. That gap is where the money is, and where most operators are not looking.

Go deeper

Why dental marketing is stuck in the waiting room+

Australian dental practices are, on average, marketing underperformers. The composite places the sector below most health services categories. The explanation is not lack of demand. Australians spend over $10 billion annually on dental services. It is that most practices have never needed sophisticated marketing. Referrals, location and insurance panel membership drove patient volume for decades.

That model is breaking down. Corporate dental chains (Pacific Smiles, 1300 Smiles, Maven Dental) have professionalised patient acquisition with marketing teams, SEO strategies and paid advertising. Independent practices that rely on street presence and word of mouth are losing market share, particularly among younger patients who search online.

Retention with a 30% weight is the most important score. The economics are stark: acquiring a new dental patient costs $150-$400, while retaining an existing one costs almost nothing if the recall system works. Yet the average Australian dental practice has a recall compliance rate below 60%. Forty percent of patients who should come back for their 6-month check-up do not, and many practices do not even notice.

Acquisition reflects the gap between practices that invest in digital presence and those that do not. The practices with optimised Google Business Profiles, 200+ reviews and professional websites capture 3-5x the online enquiry volume of comparable practices without these foundations.

The data and tracking score of 49.7 is the root cause of the broader underperformance. Without measurement, practices cannot optimise. They do not know their cost per new patient, their lifetime value per patient, which treatments drive the highest revenue or which marketing channels work. This creates a cycle where marketing feels like a cost centre rather than an investment, which in turn depresses marketing spend.

Retention rules because dental is a lifetime relationship+

Retention carries 30% of the composite, reflecting the structural economics of dentistry. A loyal patient visits twice a year for check-ups and generates $500-$2,000 annually in treatment revenue. Over a 20-year relationship, a single patient is worth $10,000-$40,000 to a practice.

Acquisition at 25% weight is significant because dental is local and competitive. In suburban Australia, there can be 3-5 dental practices within a 5km radius. The practice that shows up first on Google Maps, has the best reviews and offers online booking captures disproportionate new patient volume.

Brand and positioning at 10% understates its practical impact. The dental practices that invest in their visual identity, website quality and patient experience differentiation attract patients willing to pay more and travel further.

The three moves for dental practices+

Acquisition is the immediate priority. Google Business Profile optimisation is the single highest-ROI activity for any dental practice. Accurate hours, professional photos, 100+ reviews and regular posts. This drives the majority of new patient enquiries in most suburban practices.

Retention can improve through recall automation. Practices using platforms like Dental4Windows, EXACT or Dentally with automated 6-month recall reminders see 20-30% higher rebooking rates than those relying on reception staff to make calls.

Data and tracking needs basic infrastructure. Most practices cannot tell you their cost per new patient, their recall compliance rate or which marketing channels generate their highest-value patients. A simple new patient intake form with source tracking changes this immediately.

Highlighted terms link through to the marketing dictionary.

Frequently asked

Common questions about Dental & Orthodontics

What is the average marketing score for dental practices in Australia?+
The industry composite is 58, placing it in the lower third of health services. Retention leads (30% weight), while data and tracking is the weakest area. Most practices lack basic marketing measurement infrastructure.
How should a dental practice market itself?+
The data prioritises three areas: Google Business Profile optimisation for acquisition (56 score, 25% weight), automated recall systems for retention (60, 30% weight) and basic tracking to measure marketing effectiveness (50 on data). These three moves have the highest combined impact on composite score.
How much should a dental practice spend on marketing?+
Most independent practices spend $1,000-$5,000 per month. The benchmark data suggests the highest returns come from Google Business Profile optimisation, review management and recall automation rather than broad advertising. Corporate chains typically spend 3-5% of revenue.
How do dental practices compete with corporate chains?+
Corporate dental chains score 5-10 points above independents on acquisition and digital maturity. Independent practices compete best by emphasising continuity of care (same dentist relationship), community presence, patient experience and strong Google reviews. The retention advantage of knowing patients by name is difficult for chains to replicate.

Keep exploring

Where to go from here

Pull any thread.

Same sector

Pharmacy & Optical

Above average overall. Strongest on Digital.

Open the profile

Same sector

Health & Fitness (Gyms, Studios, PT)

Above average overall. Strongest on Digital.

Open the profile

The sector

Health & Wellbeing

Every industry in this sector, ranked.

Open the sector

The full Atlas

Explore every industry

The marketing map of corporate Australia.

Open the Atlas
See how the scoring worksExplore the full Atlas