Dental & Orthodontics
The shape tilts toward Retention & Loyalty (60.2) and away from Data & Tracking (49.7). That tilt tells you where the industry's marketing dollars have gone and where they haven't. The businesses that correct the tilt first will see outsized returns because they're fixing the constraint that's holding everything else back.
Dimension Breakdown
Bottom quartile. The bar is low. That means the opportunity to stand out is wide open.
Bupa Dental at 71.9 vs Simply Orthodontics at 47.9. That gap is wider than the difference between some entire industries. The leaders in this vertical are playing a different game.
-2.2 versus the national average of 62.4. This is where the industry has invested. The question is whether it's investing enough everywhere else to capitalise on that strength.
Why dental marketing is stuck in the waiting room
Australian dental practices are, on average, marketing underperformers. The composite of 57.6 places the sector below most health services categories. The explanation is not lack of demand. Australians spend over $10 billion annually on dental services. It is that most practices have never needed sophisticated marketing. Referrals, location and insurance panel membership drove patient volume for decades.
That model is breaking down. Corporate dental chains (Pacific Smiles, 1300 Smiles, Maven Dental) have professionalised patient acquisition with marketing teams, SEO strategies and paid advertising. Independent practices that rely on street presence and word of mouth are losing market share, particularly among younger patients who search online.
Retention at 60.2 with a 30% weight is the most important score. The economics are stark: acquiring a new dental patient costs $150-$400, while retaining an existing one costs almost nothing if the recall system works. Yet the average Australian dental practice has a recall compliance rate below 60%. Forty percent of patients who should come back for their 6-month check-up do not, and many practices do not even notice.
Acquisition at 55.8 reflects the gap between practices that invest in digital presence and those that do not. The practices with optimised Google Business Profiles, 200+ reviews and professional websites capture 3-5x the online enquiry volume of comparable practices without these foundations.
The data and tracking score of 49.7 is the root cause of the broader underperformance. Without measurement, practices cannot optimise. They do not know their cost per new patient, their lifetime value per patient, which treatments drive the highest revenue or which marketing channels work. This creates a cycle where marketing feels like a cost centre rather than an investment, which in turn depresses marketing spend.
Ranked 67th of 70. Bottom quartile. The blunt version: marketing in this vertical is an afterthought for most businesses. The opportunity version: any business that takes it seriously will have an open lane with very little competition for attention.
Where you sit in Health & Wellbeing
Explore deeper in Hub
Cross-cut Dental & Orthodontics data by taxonomy, compare dimensions across sectors and see where this industry sits nationally.
Create your HubFrequently Asked
Keep Exploring
Related industries, patterns and businesses in the Atlas.
Closest composite scores to Dental & Orthodontics (58).
The bar in Dental & Orthodontics is low. That's your advantage.
Most businesses in this vertical score below 57.6. A focused investment in Data & Tracking alone could move you ahead of the majority of your competitors. The opportunity exists because nobody else has taken it.
See where you standKeep Exploring
Related industries, patterns and businesses in the Atlas.
Closest composite scores to Dental & Orthodontics (58).