Atlas  /  Health & Wellbeing

Industry profile

Cosmetic & Aesthetics (Non-Surgical) marketing benchmarks

Strongest on Acquisition Performance, weakest on Data & Tracking. Cosmetic & Aesthetics (Non-Surgical) sits below the national average, and that tension shapes how the whole industry markets.

59
Marketing Score, six dimensions
10th
national percentile
Lower half
of its sector
-5
vs national average

Score signature

Digital61
Acquisition61
Conversion59
Retention55
Brand58
Data49

Bars are this industry. Ticks are the national average.

Biggest strength

Acquisition Performance

61 out of 100. The engine carrying the whole score.

Biggest gap

Data & Tracking

49 out of 100. The dimension dragging the industry down.

Where to start

Retention & Loyalty

The most upside per point of effort: 20% of the score and 8 points below the field.

The map

Where this industry sits

Every dot is an industry we measure. Choose any two dimensions for the axes. Cosmetic & Aesthetics (Non-Surgical) is the red mark.

Retention & Loyalty
High Retention / low Acquisition
High Retention / high Acquisition
Low Retention / low Acquisition
Low Retention / high Acquisition
Cosmetic & Aesthetics (Non-Surgical)

Acquisition Performance

DevelopingAverageAbove averageHighThis industry

Cosmetic & Aesthetics (Non-Surgical) sits below average on Retention & Loyalty and below average on Acquisition Performance. That tension defines the industry.

The spread inside the industry

Weakest · 46Midpoint · 59Strongest · 76

Every number is a Marketing Score out of 100. It rolls six dimensions into one figure, so 46 is a business doing the basics and 76 is one that markets like a business twice its size.

Developing, under 50Average, 50 to 59Above average, 60 to 69High, 70 plus

The distance between the strongest and weakest performer here is wide. A small cluster is genuinely good. A long tail sits well behind. The bar to lead this industry is lower than the reputation suggests. So where would you land?

The breakdown

How far above or below the field

Each row plots this industry against the whole field. The dot is where Cosmetic & Aesthetics (Non-Surgical) sits, the line is the national average and the faint marks are every other industry. Tap a row for what the dimension means.

Field lowNational avg 66Field high
86% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
69% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 63Field high
73% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 62Field high
86% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 64Field high
84% of the field scores higherTap for what it means
Field lowNational avg 58Field high
94% of the field scores higherTap for what it means

The read

What the numbers say about Cosmetic & Aesthetics (Non-Surgical)

On the whole, Cosmetic & Aesthetics (Non-Surgical) is one of the weaker industries we measure. It leads on acquisition performance and trails on data & tracking, and the fastest gains sit in retention & loyalty.

What is strong

Acquisition Performance

Sits in the lower half of every industry we measure. This is the engine carrying the score.

What holds it back

Data & Tracking

Sits near the back of the field. The soft spot that drags the whole number down.

Where the upside is

Retention & Loyalty

Carries the most weight in the score and sits below the field. Move this and the whole number moves with it.

A acquisition performance-led industry with a data & tracking problem. The reputation says one thing. The pipeline says another.

86%of industries score higher on Retention & Loyalty, the dimension carrying the most weight in this score. That gap is where the money is, and where most operators are not looking.

Go deeper

Beautiful results, ugly marketing infrastructure+

The Australian cosmetic aesthetics market has exploded. Non-surgical treatments grew 25%+ year-on-year post-COVID as demand normalised and social media fuelled awareness. But the marketing sophistication of the sector has not kept pace with the demand. A composite reflects an industry that is growing despite its marketing, not because of it.

Acquisition with a 30% weight is the critical dimension. In aesthetics, the client journey starts on Instagram or Google. They see a result, research the treatment, compare clinics and then maybe book a consultation. The clinics that win this journey have treatment-specific landing pages, genuine before-and-after galleries (not stock imagery) and clear pricing or at minimum price ranges.

Retention is the biggest missed opportunity. Non-surgical treatments are inherently recurring: anti-wrinkle requires maintenance every 3-4 months, skin treatments run in courses, dermal fillers need topping up. The lifetime value of a retained cosmetic client is $5,000-$20,000. Yet most clinics do nothing to systematically drive rebooking. No treatment plans, no automated reminders, no membership pricing.

The data and tracking score of 48.5 tells you why. Most clinics have no visibility into which clients return, which do not, what drives rebooking or what the actual lifetime value is per treatment type. They are making marketing decisions based on feel rather than data.

Brand is average, but in aesthetics, brand is everything. The clinics with strong brands, built on practitioner expertise, consistent visual identity and genuine results content, charge 30-50% premiums over competitors. The challenge is that many clinics default to generic luxury messaging rather than building a brand around clinical expertise and real outcomes.

Acquisition dominance in a consideration-heavy category+

Acquisition takes 30%, the highest weight. Non-surgical cosmetics is a consideration purchase. Clients research extensively before booking their first treatment. The clinics winning on acquisition dominate the research phase: Google search results, before-and-after galleries and treatment-specific landing pages.

Conversion efficiency carries 25%. The gap between researching a treatment and actually booking is where most clinics lose revenue. Price transparency, online booking, consultation availability and social proof all influence the conversion decision.

Retention at 20% and 54.8 is the weakest link. This is surprising for a category where most treatments require repeat visits. The clinics with strong retention have structured treatment plans, automated rebooking and membership programs.

Closing the gaps in aesthetics marketing+

Retention is the most urgent fix. Clients who have had one treatment are 4-5x easier to convert for a second than acquiring a new client from scratch. Treatment plan packaging, automated follow-up and loyalty pricing move this score significantly.

Data and tracking is the second-lowest in any health-related industry. Most clinics cannot tell you which treatments generate the highest lifetime value or which marketing channels produce their best clients. Installing proper attribution changes the entire marketing strategy.

Acquisition can improve through treatment-specific content. Instead of promoting "the clinic", promote the outcome: lip filler results, skin rejuvenation before and after, anti-wrinkle treatment timelines. This is how potential clients search.

Highlighted terms link through to the marketing dictionary.

Frequently asked

Common questions about Cosmetic & Aesthetics (Non-Surgical)

How do cosmetic clinics compare on marketing in Australia?+
The industry averages a composite, placing it in the lower third. Acquisition leads but retention is weak given the recurring nature of most treatments. Data and tracking is one of the lowest scores in any health-related industry.
What marketing works best for aesthetics clinics?+
Treatment-specific content drives acquisition (30% weight). Before-and-after galleries, treatment-specific landing pages and Google Ads on procedure terms outperform generic clinic branding. Instagram remains the primary discovery channel, but Google captures high-intent searchers closer to booking.
How can cosmetic clinics improve client retention?+
Retention scores just 55 despite most treatments being recurring. The highest-impact moves are structured treatment plans, automated rebooking reminders at clinically appropriate intervals and membership or package pricing that incentivises continuity.
How much should an aesthetics clinic spend on marketing?+
Typical spend ranges from $2,000 to $10,000 per month. The data suggests the highest returns come from conversion infrastructure (online booking, consultation funnels, price transparency) and retention systems (automated reminders, treatment plans) rather than increased advertising spend alone.

Keep exploring

Where to go from here

Pull any thread.

Same sector

Pharmacy & Optical

Above average overall. Strongest on Digital.

Open the profile

Same sector

Health & Fitness (Gyms, Studios, PT)

Above average overall. Strongest on Digital.

Open the profile

The sector

Health & Wellbeing

Every industry in this sector, ranked.

Open the sector

The full Atlas

Explore every industry

The marketing map of corporate Australia.

Open the Atlas
See how the scoring worksExplore the full Atlas